| Author |
Message |
caker
Joined: 15 Apr 2003
Posts: 2392
Location: Galloway, NJ
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:44 pm Post subject: Reboot: host56 (2006-04-09) |
|
|
Well, host56 panicked in a bad way. It'll be coming back up in a few after I build in the latest updates...
-Chris |
|
| Back to top |
|
Xan
Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 311
Location: Austin
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 11:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think we should make it clear, for those who might be lurking and considering buying a Linode, that Host 56 is the beta Xen host for brave souls only.
The rash of forum posts about Host 56 are not indicative of the normal Linode service. |
|
| Back to top |
|
cherring
Joined: 17 Feb 2006
Posts: 83
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes I second that, host 56 has been erratic, but this is what you potentially sign up for when you get involved in a beta test. My old host before I was part of Xen was great, the only reboots I had were because I kept busting things up.
Big thumbs up for Linode 8) |
|
| Back to top |
|
asura
Joined: 03 Jan 2004
Posts: 71
Location: Oregon
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Agree whole heartedly. Regular UML Linodes are great, stable, and fast. I've made a few wise cracks about Host56 and Xen, but I did sign up for the beta test fully aware that the advertised 99.9% uptime does not apply for the beta testers. The only thing I am running at the moment is a web site and email. I can tolerate not getting spam in my mailbox for a couple of hours. :) |
|
| Back to top |
|
SirPallas
Joined: 19 Oct 2005
Posts: 12
Location: California
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I opened a support ticket about being returned to a normal host, but no one has responded yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
