 |
Linode.com Forum Linode Community Forums
|
| Author |
Message |
smiffy
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 66
Location: 80 miles from Adelaide, Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 6:01 pm Post subject: Aussies hosting/thinking of hosting at Hurricane Electric |
|
|
I've always found the connection between me (South Australia) and my Linode in Hurricane Electric to be very good - very little latency.
The news gets better though:
"Telstras new submarine cable lands in Sydney"
http://www.telegeography.com/cu/article.php?article_id=22562
Should be 'lit' by the end of the year. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deckert
Joined: 24 Mar 2007
Posts: 42
Location: South Africa
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 3:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
smiffy:
What, if I may ask, is your latency from the land of Oz?
--deckert |
|
| Back to top |
|
smiffy
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 66
Location: 80 miles from Adelaide, Australia
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Don't know what to give you exactly, here are some quick diags; I've obfustictated my IP address as you have no idea who might end up reading this...
Ping!
Code:
PING andreas (64.71.foo.bar) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from andreas (64.71.foo.bar): icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=229 ms
64 bytes from andreas (64.71.foo.bar): icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=228 ms
64 bytes from andreas (64.71.foo.bar): icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=230 ms
64 bytes from andreas (64.71.foo.bar): icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=229 ms
64 bytes from andreas (64.71.foo.bar): icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=229 ms
64 bytes from andreas (64.71.foo.bar): icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=230 ms
64 bytes from andreas (64.71.foo.bar): icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=228 ms
64 bytes from andreas (64.71.foo.bar): icmp_seq=8 ttl=56 time=228 ms
64 bytes from andreas (64.71.foo.bar): icmp_seq=9 ttl=56 time=229 ms
64 bytes from andreas (64.71.foo.bar): icmp_seq=10 ttl=56 time=229 ms
64 bytes from andreas (64.71.foo.bar): icmp_seq=11 ttl=56 time=230 ms
64 bytes from andreas (64.71.foo.bar): icmp_seq=12 ttl=56 time=228 ms
64 bytes from andreas (64.71.foo.bar): icmp_seq=13 ttl=56 time=229 ms
64 bytes from andreas (64.71.foo.bar): icmp_seq=14 ttl=56 time=229 ms
--- andreas ping statistics ---
14 packets transmitted, 14 received, 0% packet loss, time 12998ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 228.575/229.513/230.779/0.786 ms
My Tiny Rodent (mtr :wink:)
Code:
HOST: brutus Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. mercurio 0.0% 20 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.1
2. lns10.adl2.internode.on.net 0.0% 20 14.4 21.6 13.5 101.6 22.2
3. vl14.cor3.adl2.internode.on. 0.0% 20 64.6 28.6 14.0 114.2 28.8
4. gi0-3.bdr1.adl6.internode.on 0.0% 20 247.0 218.4 188.9 338.8 49.4
5. pos4-0.bdr1.syd7.internode.o 0.0% 20 307.4 261.4 228.8 384.4 51.6
6. pos2-3.bdr1.sjc2.internode.o 0.0% 20 257.0 201.4 191.3 274.1 23.1
7. sjo-ix.he.net 0.0% 20 199.3 200.7 191.0 295.2 24.0
8. 10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.f 5.0% 20 194.4 200.7 192.5 283.0 20.3
9. andreas 10.0% 20 252.4 239.1 228.4 320.9 25.5
Think I'm fairly safe posting my ISP's stuff. Mercurio is my local ADSL router, everything else is remote.
Hope this helps; ssh takes 2-3 seconds to connect, not huge delays once connected unless my local ADSL connection is doing anything else heavy. Let's put it this way, I've had dumb terminals run slower in the same building as the server than I get throwing packets half way round the world. Performance to my Linode at The Planet (Dallas) is somewhat slower, but then I've got a slower Linode there, too. Shout if you need anything else.
Cheers
M |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deckert
Joined: 24 Mar 2007
Posts: 42
Location: South Africa
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, the 230ms latency figure is what I was after. Comparatively, my latency is within norms then (at 330ms from South Africa to the US, via London).
--deckert |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|