| Author |
Message |
brlewis
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2004 9:12 pm Post subject: correct master file? |
|
|
I'm hoping to use bind9 to run DNS myself. It looks like I get the right IP address back from dig @65.19.178.131 brlewis.com, but never having done this before I want to be sure I'm not doing some kind of subtle screwup. Anyone see a mistake in this master file for brlewis.com?
@ IN SOA ns1.brlewis.com. (
2004060101 ; Serial (yyyymmddxx)
86400 ; Refresh (1 day)
7200 ; Retry (2 hours)
604800 ; Expire (7 days)
86400 ) ; Minimum (1 day)
IN NS ns1.brlewis.com.
brlewis.com. IN A 65.19.178.131
www IN CNAME brlewis.com.
ns1 IN A 65.19.178.131 |
|
| Back to top |
|
sweh
Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 234
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 10:19 am Post subject: Re: correct master file? |
|
|
brlewis wrote:
@ IN SOA ns1.brlewis.com. (
2004060101 ; Serial (yyyymmddxx)
86400 ; Refresh (1 day)
7200 ; Retry (2 hours)
604800 ; Expire (7 days)
86400 ) ; Minimum (1 day)
Aren't you missing an entry in this SOA record? After "ns1.brlewis.com." you need your contact address (with @ converted to .)
The format is
Code:
@ IN SOA origin mail.addr (
serial refresh retry expire ttl)
The line beginning "brlewis.com." may be better of using @ as the name, so it references implicitly the zone you are defining (same as with the SOA record) for consistency. But that's just a matter of taste :-) |
|
| Back to top |
|
brlewis
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll defer to someone else's taste. My DNS needs are so normal that I don't think I need to agonize over anything, or even get a deep understanding of all the RFCs.
@ IN SOA ns1.brlewis.com. brlewis.alum.mit.edu (
2004060101 ; Serial (yyyymmddxx)
86400 ; Refresh (1 day)
7200 ; Retry (2 hours)
604800 ; Expire (7 days)
86400 ) ; Minimum (1 day)
IN NS ns1.brlewis.com.
@ IN A 65.19.178.131
www IN CNAME brlewis.com.
ns1 IN A 65.19.178.131 |
|
| Back to top |
|
brlewis
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I suppose though I should at least have an MX record. I also added a $TTL line because bind was noting its absence in syslog (falling back on min ttl).
Code: $TTL 1d
@ IN SOA ns1.brlewis.com. brlewis.alum.mit.edu (
2004061501 ; Serial (yyyymmddxx)
86400 ; Refresh (1 day)
7200 ; Retry (2 hours)
604800 ; Expire (7 days)
86400 ) ; Minimum (1 day)
IN NS ns1.brlewis.com.
@ IN A 65.19.178.131
@ IN MX 50 65.19.178.131
www IN CNAME brlewis.com.
ns1 IN A 65.19.178.131
ns2 IN A 65.19.178.131
|
|
| Back to top |
|
sweh
Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 234
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 6:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
A quick glance and there's a few things. FIrstly, MX records should point to A records, not to IP addresses...
Code:
% nslookup -silent -type=mx brlewis.com 65.19.178.131
Server: 65.19.178.131
Address: 65.19.178.131#53
brlewis.com mail exchanger = 50 65.19.178.131.brlewis.com.
There are a couple of minor points you may not be aware of. The first is that since you have multiple entries for "@" they can all be collapsed into one.
The second is the CNAME for www. Because it's a CNAME you now also have MX records, NS records and SOA records for the "www" name etc etc
Code:
% nslookup -silent -type=mx www.brlewis.com 65.19.178.131
Server: 65.19.178.131
Address: 65.19.178.131#53
www.brlewis.com canonical name = brlewis.com.
brlewis.com mail exchanger = 50 65.19.178.131.brlewis.com.
It's just a minor point :-)
What I would do is:
Code: $TTL 1d
@ IN SOA ns1.brlewis.com. brlewis.alum.mit.edu (
2004061601 ; Serial (yyyymmddxx)
86400 ; Refresh (1 day)
7200 ; Retry (2 hours)
604800 ; Expire (7 days)
86400 ) ; Minimum (1 day)
IN NS ns1.brlewis.com.
IN A 65.19.178.131
IN MX 50 mail.brlewis.com.
; We use the same IP address a lot, because we use different
; names for the same service. We could just have
; "linode.brlewis.com" as the one name, but...
www IN A 65.19.178.131
ns1 IN A 65.19.178.131
ns2 IN A 65.19.178.131
mail IN A 65.19.178.131
Note that the same IP address is used in lots of places now. As the comment says, we _could_ reduce it and just have it twice (an A record for the @ line, and an A record for a general line (eg "linode") and have everything (NS, MX,WWW) all point to that. That's just a matter of taste :-) |
|
| Back to top |
|
wirehead
Joined: 03 Jun 2004
Posts: 23
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 10:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| And don't forget to do everybody a favor and create an SPF record. ;) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |