--- Day changed --- Log opened Thu May 29 00:00:02 2003 00:51 < mistik1> david: I have networking between uml and host working 00:51 < david> mistik1: with a bridge? 00:52 < mistik1> yes 00:52 < mistik1> working on uml to world now 00:52 < mistik1> I keep geeting an error in host logs when I try to ping out 00:53 < mistik1> iptables is using br0 as int_if 00:53 < david> yay 00:53 < david> mistik1: if you have any rules with '-i eth0' or whatever, you'll need to switch them to the bridge interface 00:54 < mistik1> eth0 in my case is the external_if 00:55 < mistik1> the one that connects to the world 00:55 < mistik1> and the tap# are in the bridge 00:56 < mistik1> my firewall is set to masq everthing from br0 00:57 < david> ah,ok 01:53 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has quit [Quit: be back soon (i hope)] 01:57 -!- Lathiat [lathiat@2001:618:4:18c2::20] has joined #uml 03:55 -!- rohi [~rohit@61.11.22.137] has joined #uml 04:40 < caker> 2.4.21-rc6 has the pause fix! 04:40 * caker drools 04:40 < green> it does not work according to the posts in lkml 04:44 < caker> yeah - just found the "2.4.21-rc6" thread .. I'll have to give it a shot 05:33 -!- caker [~null@68.52.196.167] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 05:35 -!- george_t [~gtsouloup@zoe.cs.ucy.ac.cy] has joined #uml 05:38 -!- caker [~null@68.52.196.167] has joined #uml 05:40 < george_t> Hi all, I have a problem when running 2 umls on the same machine. I'm using "uml_switch -tap tap0 " for access to the external network. The umls are configured for DHCP but the problem is that the 2 umls end up with the same IP. Has anyone encountered something similar? 05:45 < green> sounds like you have identical mac addresses on uml network interfaces 06:22 < george_t> actually I dont... Even whe sniffed off the host machine they do show up as FE:FD:00:00:00:00 and FE:FD:00:00:00:01. The DHCP replyies twice with the same address. This may not be unl-specific, I'mjust wondering. 06:30 -!- register [~tof@abidos.raceme.org] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 07:39 -!- snide [~snide@81.48.243.69] has joined #uml 07:59 -!- raceme [~tof@abidos.raceme.org] has joined #uml 08:20 < mistik1> george_t: how are you starting you uml? 10:11 -!- smcavoy [~smcavoy@207.61.160.163] has joined #uml 10:12 -!- smcavoy [~smcavoy@207.61.160.163] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 10:15 -!- jdike [~jdike@dhcp05.ists.dartmouth.edu] has joined #uml 10:15 < jdike> hi guys 10:16 < ichilton> jdike: Hi Jeff 10:17 < ichilton> [ian@frodo:~]$ uname -a 10:17 < ichilton> Linux frodo 2.4.19-45um #1 Sat Dec 28 18:56:48 GMT 2002 i686 GNU/Linux 10:17 < ichilton> [ian@frodo:~]$ uptime 10:17 < ichilton> 15:06:54 up 141 days, 13:37, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 10:17 < ichilton> jdike: not bad huh? 10:17 < jdike> ichilton: nice, what does it do? 10:18 < ichilton> jdike: Sits on port 22 incoming to get into my network from outside and I use it to shell out to outside boxes. I also irc from it. 10:20 < ichilton> jdike: My dns/nis server uml has been up 132 days, my mail server uml 96 days, my tunnels/vpn uml 106 days, my monitoring uml 86 days and my webserver uml 64 days. 10:20 < ichilton> not bad at all :) 10:21 -!- rohi [~rohit@61.11.22.137] has quit [Quit: Client Exiting] 10:22 < BB2> i know its rather OT - but dont suppose anyone can give me pointers as to why a connection to any port would stall before even getting to the program (on host kernel) on interface with real ip, yet work fine on private ip 10:23 < ichilton> bb: router problem? 10:23 < BB2> ichilton theres only a switch inbetween the two machines 10:23 < ichilton> ah 10:24 < ichilton> hum 10:24 < ichilton> very strange 10:24 < jdike> BB2: what does tcpdump say? 10:24 < BB2> jdike dunno i'm yet to compile that.. just been using iptraf in promisc mode 10:26 < david> hello 10:27 < ichilton> hi david 10:27 < BB2> hi david 10:29 < snide> hi all 10:29 < BB2> hmm i see lots of "16:17:56.125248 802.1d unknown version" 10:30 * jdike reads the logs to see what nasty things people say about me in my absence... 10:31 < BB2> lol 10:31 < snide> BB2: u'r on a VLAN ? 10:31 -!- raceme [~tof@abidos.raceme.org] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 10:31 < david> BB2: 802.1d is STP from a bridge, I believe 10:32 < BB2> snide yeah its a vlan segment 10:32 < jdike> david: looking at your php kernel config... 10:32 -!- raceme [~tof@abidos.raceme.org] has joined #uml 10:32 < david> jdike: uh oh :-) 10:33 < david> jdike: it doesn't do anything yet 10:33 < BB2> david it looks good tho ;) 10:33 < jdike> david: when you get the bugs out (and working), you might submit it 10:33 < jdike> david: the parser is the hard part 10:33 < ichilton> david: php kernel config? 10:33 < david> kernels.usermodelinux.org/build/parse.php 10:33 < jdike> david: it's simple to turn the submitted form into a .config 10:34 < david> jdike: there are some kernel config options it still doesn't parse properly 10:34 < david> jdike: I was going to tie it to a session and build a .config and send it to another box to build a binary 10:34 < ichilton> david: nifty, that's what I wanted to do, but never got chance 10:35 < jdike> david: does it get the defaults right? I.e. read from .config or defconfig? 10:35 * BB2 grumbles and removes the tick for STP from the darn switch 10:35 < david> jdike: FYI, I built a couple of 2.4.20-5um bins - Might want to link to those since peoplekeep bitching about RH9 10:35 < david> jdike: yeah, from defcofnig in arch/um 10:36 < ichilton> david: is the source available for bedtime reading? :) 10:36 < david> let me clean it up first 10:36 < ichilton> k 10:37 < david> AFAIK, it doesn't handle dep_tristate properly yet 10:37 < david> and a couple of other things 10:38 < snide> jdike: so... grep /nasty,jdike/ log seems rather long today ;-) 10:41 < snide> BB2: doesn't ur switch present a VLAN directly ? 10:42 < snide> BB2: or is it a trunk port ? 10:42 -!- radical [~radical@210.7.75.194] has joined #uml 10:54 < green> Hi Jeff! 10:55 < jdike> Hey Oleg! 10:55 * green hates silly people who constantly cut our fiber-optic lines 11:00 -!- david changed the topic of #uml to: User Mode Linux | 2.4.20-5um, 2.5.69-1um, 2.4.21-rc5-djc1-5um | http://user-mode-linux.sf.net | http://usermodelinux.org | http://usermodelinux.co.uk | http://uml.openconsultancy.com | http://www.stearns.org/slartibartfast 11:00 < david> jdike: are you ever going to release another 'release' for 2.4? 11:01 < jdike> david: yeah 11:01 < jdike> david: the 2.4.19 stuff is getting a bit old 11:02 < david> jdike: what has it been, 7 months? :-) 11:02 * jdike checks 11:02 < david> uh, September 11:02 < david> 8mths 11:02 < david> wow 11:02 * jdike would like to be out of the RPM business anyway 11:03 < david> jdike: release doesn't mean RPM, it just means 'binary' - Get someone else to packet it all 11:03 < jdike> david: anyone can build UML 11:04 < david> jdike: you sure? :-) 11:04 < jdike> david: there are other people who are probably better than me at judging UML quality anyway 11:04 < david> jdike: indeed 11:05 < david> jdike: 2.4.19-45um was a good year :-) 11:05 * ichilton cheers 11:05 < jdike> david: I'd like them to start releasing UML binaries 11:05 < ichilton> david: [ian@frodo:~]$ w 11:05 < ichilton> 15:55:11 up 141 days, 14:23, 3 users, load average: 0.03, 0.01, 0.00 11:05 < david> jdike: kernels.usermodelinux.org :-0 11:05 < david> :-) 11:05 < david> jdike: I just don't use the vanilla 2.4.20 tree since it's crap 11:05 < ichilton> david: Linux frodo 2.4.19-45um #1 Sat Dec 28 18:56:48 GMT 2002 i686 GNU/Linux 11:05 < jdike> david: yup, that's a start 11:05 < david> ichilton: yep 11:05 < ichilton> david: why's it crap? 11:06 < david> ichilton: ptrace exploit, routeing DOS, netfilter in it is old 11:06 < ichilton> david: ah, so what do you use nowadays? 11:06 < david> quicker they get 2.4.21 out the better, IMHO 11:06 < ichilton> david: and what are you using as a host kernel? 11:06 < david> ichilton: kernels.usermodelinux.org/kernels/ 11:06 < david> ichilton: 2.4.21-pre-something 11:07 < ichilton> david: 2.4.21-pre-something for host? 11:07 < david> ichilton: yeah 11:07 < green> david: Marcelo promised to release 2.4.22 very fast ;) 11:07 < ichilton> david: which what patches? 11:07 < david> ichilton: not much of anything 11:07 < ichilton> david: just skas? 11:07 < david> ichilton: pretty much 11:07 < ichilton> david: no fairsched anymore? 11:08 < david> ah, yes 11:08 < david> I use that 11:09 < ichilton> it still applies cleanly to .21-rc? 11:10 * green wonders when vsyscall backport to 2.4 will appear 11:10 < david> ichilton: seems to 11:11 < ichilton> david: cool 11:16 * BB2 now notes it works fine from a windows machine just not from linux, if its routed/vpnd/masq'd via linux its fine still.. i want to go home 11:20 * jdike makes a tools release 11:20 < jdike> To fix the uml_net security bug 11:21 < david> jdike: can you fix the COW bug too - I had ~8 UMLs drop dead because of it 11:21 < david> all running RH9, for some odd reason 11:21 < david> Debian is just fine 11:22 < jdike> david: yeah, tho I'm wondering whether fixing that calls for COW V3 at the same time 11:22 < BB2> hmm COW but with more beef .. sounds good to me 11:23 * Lathiat laughs 11:23 < david> jdike: what does cow v3 do? 11:23 < jdike> david: BTW, I don't have write access to your UML dl mirror any more 11:23 < jdike> david: fix the rounding error (which is what's been killing UMLs) 11:24 < jdike> david: sector alignment for the pieces of the COW file 11:24 -!- radical [~radical@210.7.75.194] has quit [Quit: Client Exiting] 11:24 < david> jdike: I fixed that - Check you're a memeber of the 'umlorg' group 11:24 -!- raceme [~tof@abidos.raceme.org] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 11:24 < david> jdike: sounds good - go with that :-) 11:25 < jdike> david: support for multiple bitmap formats 11:25 < jdike> david: I think that's it 11:26 < david> jdike: so I can convert existing COW to v3, or not? 11:26 < jdike> david: Yeah, nothing's being lost 11:29 -!- karm [karm@62.212.96.119] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 11:33 -!- raceme [~tof@abidos.raceme.org] has joined #uml 11:42 < snide> btw, are modules still disabled in uml ? 11:42 < jdike> snide: in 2.5, yes 11:43 < snide> jdike: btw, does skas work the same way in 2.5 & 2.4 ? 11:44 < jdike> snide: yes 11:48 -!- karm [karm@conurb.net] has joined #uml 11:57 -!- amrut [~amrut@203.124.158.218] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 11:57 -!- amrut [~amrut@203.124.158.218] has joined #uml 12:01 < david> jdike: can you post to uml.org? 12:03 < george_t> Repost: Hi all, I have a problem when running 2 umls on the same machine. I'm using "uml_switch -tap tap0 " for access to the external network. The umls are configured for DHCP but the problem is that the 2 umls end up with the same IP. Has anyone encountered something similar? -- I do specify different ethernet addresses for each, and I verified it using tcpdump. 12:04 < david> green: what command line are you running the UMLs with? 12:04 < david> uh 12:04 < david> george_t: that was to you 12:04 < david> george_t: Remember, if you don't spec. a MAC on the command line, the first IP used by the UML is used to set it 12:05 < george_t> linux ubd0=cow00,rh72_full eth0=daemon,FE:FD:00:00:00:00 12:05 < george_t> linux ubd0=cow01,rh72_full eth0=daemon,FE:FD:00:00:00:01 12:06 < jdike> george_t: Can you see the IP addresses in the DHCP traffic? 12:07 < george_t> in fact the DHCP ACK i get for both is identical except for the Client physical address which is FE:FD:00:00:00:00 and FE:FD:00:00:00:01 respectively 12:07 < david> george_t: what does your DHCP server think? 12:08 < jdike> george_t: it would appear that the DHCP server is flaking out, then 12:08 < snide> george_t: does the dhcp server listen on tap0 ? 12:08 < george_t> the DHCP is not mine to play with unfortunately 12:08 < george_t> the dhcp server is aphysical machine 12:09 < david> george_t: uh, wait 12:09 < david> george_t: what is tap0 doing? 12:09 < david> are you routeing DHCP packets, masquerading them, or what? 12:09 < snide> george_t: or do u have a dhcp_agent running between tap0 & eth0 ? 12:09 < david> if you are going to use DHCP you want to bridge tap0 onto eth0 or something 12:09 < snide> david: a dhcp_agent would be perfect ;-) 12:09 < george_t> well i use uml_switch -tap tap0 12:10 -!- radical [~radical@210.7.75.194] has joined #uml 12:10 < snide> george_t: dhcp doesn't work through ip routing. 12:10 < david> george_t: what is tap0 doing? 12:10 < david> anything? 12:10 < george_t> ok... :) 12:11 < george_t> but I do get an IP for the first UML 12:11 < snide> george_t: so, either u have a dhcp_agent, or u have ethernet routing - usually via bridging 12:11 < george_t> only the second one get the same one 12:11 < snide> george_t: sure ! since the MAC is the host one... 12:12 < david> george_t: bridge eth0 and tap0 together and try again 12:12 < george_t> the host gets a totally different IP again through DHCP 12:14 < george_t> brctl show 12:14 < george_t> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces 12:14 < george_t> br0 8000.0040f4239cc8 no eth0 12:14 < george_t> tap0 12:14 < george_t> tap1 12:14 < george_t> tap2 12:14 < george_t> tap3 12:16 < george_t> Correction: the host is configured statically 12:23 -!- snide [~snide@81.48.243.69] has quit [Quit: My damn controlling terminal disappeared!] 12:29 < david> jdike: can you post that to uml.org? :-) 12:30 < jdike> david: working on it... 12:30 < david> jdike: thanks 12:32 < jdike> david: posted 12:36 < david> jdike: thanks 12:41 -!- snide [~snide@81.48.243.69] has joined #uml 12:53 < david> jdike: try to rsync stuff to my mirror - it should let you now 12:57 < jdike> david: I did already, it 12:57 < jdike> 's fine 12:59 < snide> in skas, the uml userspace process is the one that emulates the CPU ? or is it the combination of the kernel & userspace process ? 13:00 < jdike> david: There's a link to your kernels now 13:00 < jdike> snide: combo 13:00 < jdike> snide: they take turns running 13:02 < snide> jdike: hmmm.. 13:03 < snide> jdike: the kernel interrupts the userspace and switch his context no ? 13:03 < snide> s/kernel/kernel-thread/ 13:03 < jdike> snide: No 13:03 < jdike> snide: The host kernel does 13:04 < david> jdike: ok, cool 13:04 < snide> jdike: oh ? 13:04 < david> jdike: where's the link? 13:05 < jdike> david: download.html 13:05 < snide> jdike: oh... the kernel-t asks the kernel for the user-t to be switched ? 13:05 < snide> hmm : the kernel-t asks the host for the user-t to be switched ? 13:05 < jdike> snide: no 13:05 < snide> jdike: ahh... i'll try again ;-p 13:05 < jdike> snide: the user-t asks the host for SIGVTALRM 13:05 < david> jdike: I don't see it 13:06 < jdike> snide: the kernel-t sees that and does the switch, if necessary 13:06 < jdike> david: err 13:06 < jdike> david: dl-sf.html 13:06 < snide> jdike: it's not really preemptive that way 13:07 < jdike> snide: sure it is 13:07 < snide> jdike: i'm missing something then ;-) 13:07 < snide> jdike: do u have some kind of doc about the way it works ? [ that way i'll read silently ] 13:08 < jdike> snide: not really, although there was a lkml post in which I explained this some 13:08 < jdike> snide: search lwn.net for it 13:08 < snide> jdike: ok 13:10 < david> jdike: okay, flound it - had to shift-reload ti 13:17 < david> jdike: did you get my skas.xml patch or not? 13:19 < jdike> david: yup, haven't really looked at it yet 13:21 < snide> jdike: got the page on lwn. [ several even ] but they do explain how /proc/mm works, not uml-skas ;-) [ continues searching ] 13:23 < jdike> snide: that's it 13:23 < jdike> snide: I never really described how UML actually uses it 13:24 -!- Lathiat [lathiat@2001:618:4:18c2::20] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 13:25 < snide> jdike: hmm... actually u did... [ okay not really clearly but better than what i had : a post in fa.linux.kernel ] 13:29 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has joined #uml 13:42 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 13:43 * jdike updates the hostfs docs 13:50 -!- radical [~radical@210.7.75.194] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 13:53 -!- radical [~radical@210.7.75.194] has joined #uml 14:02 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has joined #uml 14:16 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 14:20 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has joined #uml 14:40 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has quit [Ping timeout: 492 seconds] 14:45 -!- livio [~livio@200.162.231.47] has joined #uml 15:09 -!- george_t [~gtsouloup@zoe.cs.ucy.ac.cy] has quit [Quit: Client Exiting] 15:20 -!- btl [~btl@217.133.209.24] has joined #uml 15:25 < btl> jdike: Hi 15:26 < btl> jdike: Can you explain me why enclosing kernel_thread in kernel/fork.c with #ifdef...#ifndef doesn't fix ? 15:27 < jdike> btf: because someone put it there on purpose, it's in kernel/ so someone decided it was needed for all arches, so commenting it out for one arch is probably a bad idea 15:27 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has joined #uml 15:27 < btl> jdike: you're right.... but why not replace with arch_kernel_thread? 15:28 < jdike> btf: kernel_thread -> arch_kernel_thread is the fix, IIRC 15:30 < btl> jdike: So, i can change kernel_thread (in arch/um/kernel_process_kern.c) function name in arch_kernel_thread? 15:30 -!- ASY- [~someone@216.221.51.54] has joined #uml 15:30 -!- ASY [~someone@216.221.51.54] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 15:31 -!- ASY- is now known as ASY 15:31 < btl> jdike: I'm a IRC newbie... what does IIRC mean? 15:33 < jdike> btf: if i recall correctly 15:33 < btl> jdike:...ok i'm trying 15:35 < david> btl: kernel_thread in kernel/fork.c is just a wrapper to arch_kernel_thread 15:35 < david> btl: it was implimented for the ptrace 'fix' 15:35 < btl> david: In which kernel version? 15:35 < david> btl: arch/um/kernel/process_kern.c should have arch_kernel_thread and not kernel_thread 15:35 < david> btl: 15:35 < david> er 15:35 < david> >2.4.20 15:36 < david> btl: or are you using 2.5? 15:36 < btl> david: no.. i'm using 2.4.21-rc4aa1 15:36 < david> ok 15:36 < david> so you need to rename kernel_thread to arch_kernel_thread in arch/uk/kernel/process_kern.c 15:37 < david> since the ptrace patch doesn't do anything to arch/um as arch/um isn't in the vanilla ernel 15:37 < david> kernel 15:37 < btl> david: Thanx 15:37 < david> btl: np 15:37 < btl> david: Keep in touch because i think that isn't the only problem .... please, don't go away ;( 15:38 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 15:39 < david> heh 15:39 < david> btl: there was some extern to change too 15:40 < btl> david: I think i need to add extern arch_kernel_thread ... in asm-um/processor-generic.h is it right? 15:41 < david> you just change kernel_thread to arch_kernel_thread 15:41 < david> kernel_thread is now non-arch specific 15:41 < btl> Yes, but i need to declare arch_kernel_thread as extern 15:41 < david> nod 15:42 < david> just change kernel_thread to arch_kernel_thread in asm-um/processor-generic.h 15:42 < btl> david: That was i mean... sorry.. i don't speak english very well 15:43 < david> btl: that's fine - English is the only language I speak halfway well :-) 15:43 < btl> david: Where are you from? 15:43 < david> btl: England, but I'm in the US now 15:43 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has joined #uml 15:44 < btl> btl: Cool 15:44 < btl> david: s/btl/david/ ;)) 15:44 < snide> david: ;-) 15:50 < btl> davide|jdike: I think time has come to change return type of arch_kernel_thread/kernel_thread in pid_t 15:52 -!- _olly_ [~bibble@m43-mp1.cvx2-b.war.dial.ntli.net] has joined #uml 16:01 < caker> jdike: btw, I got the IRC archive/stats up 16:01 < caker> jdike: once I get around to implementing a search (besides google), I'll announce it... 16:01 < jdike> caker: I noticed, tx 16:01 < caker> jdike: np 16:02 < jdike> caker: you might add the URL to /topic 16:03 -!- caker changed the topic of #uml to: User Mode Linux | 2.4.20-5um, 2.5.69-1um, 2.4.21-rc5-djc1-5um | http://user-mode-linux.sf.net | http://usermodelinux.org | http://usermodelinux.co.uk | http://uml.openconsultancy.com | http://www.stearns.org/slartibartfast | #uml Archives: http://www.theshore.net/uml/irc/ 16:05 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has quit [Ping timeout: 492 seconds] 16:06 * jdike likes "Some big numbers..." at the bottom of http://www.theshore.net/uml/irc/stats/ 16:06 < caker> heh 16:06 < jdike> I seem not to have come to its attention though 16:08 < jdike> and I'm not even in the top ten most active :-( 16:08 < caker> hehe 16:08 < caker> keep talkin ... 16:08 -!- _olly_ [~bibble@m43-mp1.cvx2-b.war.dial.ntli.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 16:12 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has joined #uml 16:12 -!- _olly_ [~bibble@192.76.27.110] has joined #uml 16:20 < snide> caker: ;) 16:21 < snide> caker: could u just put a mime type for .log of text/plain ? 16:21 < caker> hmm 16:21 < caker> what's it coming across as? 16:21 < caker> my server has mod_gzip installed, so it should compress on the fly - what browser are you using? 16:22 < snide> caker: IE6 ;-) 16:22 < caker> snide: same here (caker runs) . no problems 16:22 < snide> caker: yeah, but it offers me to d/l the file 16:22 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 16:24 < caker> snide: try now ? 16:24 < snide> caker: i would prefer that it opens directly the file (and w/o special configuration of my browser...) But anyway, it's just for my personal convenience ;-) 16:24 < snide> caker: waa... perfect ;-) 16:25 < caker> snide: strange .. glad I could help .. actually, I remember now, I made a file association on my windows machine for .log so maybe that over-rode the mime .. stupid windows 16:26 < snide> caker: i don't really like home-brewed mime overloading... [specially when the information comes from the filename extension ;-) ] 16:27 < david> caker: wow, 'david' is the 2nd most popular word 16:27 < snide> david: ;-) 16:27 < caker> david: that's because we all say david a bunch of times, david 16:28 < caker> actually, it's all from mistik1 :-p 16:28 < snide> david: don't answer questions... ppl won't ask u ;-) --- Log closed Thu May 29 16:34:08 2003 --- Log opened Thu May 29 16:36:19 2003 16:36 -!- caker [~null@68.52.196.167] has joined #uml 16:36 < david> Cliff: not really 16:36 < Cliff> heh ok:) 16:36 < david> Cliff: documentation is at the end of my todo list 16:36 < Cliff> oh ok 16:37 < Cliff> meaning lowest priority ?:) 16:37 < caker> Cliff: isn't documentation always? 16:37 < Cliff> heh 16:38 < Cliff> so am i supposed to use it in interactive commandline php? 16:38 < Cliff> i've initialized the d 16:38 < Cliff> db 16:38 < david> Cliff: yes, it requires php as a cgi to be compiled 16:38 < Cliff> ok 16:38 < david> it also requires pcntl support in php 16:38 < Cliff> see that's probably what i was missing 16:38 < Cliff> thanks 16:43 -!- Cliff [none@209.178.149.84] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 16:50 -!- Cliff [none@209.178.173.148] has joined #uml 16:51 < btl> david: Can you tell me how does it fix without applync 2.4.20-uml5 patch? 16:51 < btl> david: s/applync/applyng 16:53 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 16:57 < david> btl: er, look for SIG_IGN somewhere 16:58 < david> 16:58 < david> This is a totally standard error with RedHat 9, as their kernel changes 16:58 < david> trigger a potential bug in UML. Deleting the line 16:58 < david> (void) CHOOSE_MODE(signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN), (void *) 0); 16:58 < david> from arch/um/kernel/process.c before compiling the uml kernel seems to 16:58 < david> get tt mode working. 16:58 < david> 16:58 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has joined #uml 17:01 < jdike> the gf announces that she's coming up to my place tonight, so I have to run home and clean :-) 17:02 < caker> uh oh .. bye jeff :-) 17:02 < BB> heh ;) 17:02 < _olly_> heh 17:02 -!- jdike [~jdike@dhcp05.ists.dartmouth.edu] has quit [Quit: where'd the cats hide the vacuum cleaner?] 17:02 -!- Cliff [none@209.178.173.148] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 17:05 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 17:06 -!- Cliff [none@pool0341.cvx37-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net] has joined #uml 17:09 -!- radical [~radical@210.7.75.194] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 17:09 -!- Cliff [none@pool0341.cvx37-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 17:25 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has joined #uml 17:32 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 17:34 -!- _olly_ [~bibble@192.76.27.110] has quit [Quit: hasta la vista, baby] 17:49 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has joined #uml 17:49 < snide> hmm... it seems we'll need a /proc/um/ soon [ with more patchs like P.Kilian's ] 17:50 -!- Ryback_ [~ra993482@143.106.24.143] has joined #uml 17:56 < snide> strange, when i'm issuing a vmstat inside, i've got a 'Unknown HZ value (0) Assume 100.' followed by a SEGFAULT 17:57 < david> why is HZ 0? 17:57 < david> that sounds screwed 17:58 < snide> david: i don't know... HZ=0 *is* a Bad hing 17:58 < snide> s/hing/Thing/ 18:08 < snide> is it possible that procps version 2.0.7 is too old for a 2.5.69 ? 18:09 < snide> (it's the standard procps from the Debian/woody) 18:09 -!- Ryback_ [~ra993482@143.106.24.143] has quit [Quit: Client Exiting] 18:24 < david> maybe 18:24 < david> ii procps 3.1.8-1 The /proc file system utilities 18:24 < david> 2.0.7 is ancient :-) 18:24 < snide> david: ;-) 18:26 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 18:27 * snide is impressed by the 2.5 build system... 18:29 -!- mrallen [~devnull@pcp745118pcs.reston01.va.comcast.net] has joined #uml 18:33 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has joined #uml 18:37 -!- snide [~snide@81.48.243.69] has quit [Quit: Sleeping time] 18:37 -!- btl [~btl@217.133.209.24] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 18:56 < mistik1> evening gents 18:57 -!- mrallen [~devnull@pcp745118pcs.reston01.va.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: [x]chat] 21:27 < Lathiat> how can i mount a drive as a uml block device 21:27 < Lathiat> so i can read patitions inside it etc 21:45 < ElectricElf> Lathiat: 'ubd0=/dev/whatever', ie: 'ubd0=/dev/hda' 21:45 < ElectricElf> Lathiat: But if the host or any other UML is accessing the same partition/filesystem, it'll get completely hosed. 21:52 -!- dg_ [dgl@217.155.7.197] has joined #uml 21:54 -!- Lathiat [~Lathiat@seven.ipv6.sixlabs.org] has quit [Ping timeout: 492 seconds] 21:54 -!- mace [mace@bub.ipv6.darksilence.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 492 seconds] 21:54 -!- dg [dgl@otherwize.co.uk] has quit [Ping timeout: 492 seconds] 22:53 -!- livio [~livio@200.162.231.47] has quit [Quit: Download Gaim [http://gaim.sourceforge.net/]] 22:59 -!- pirlouit [~peter@64.162.195.202] has joined #uml --- Log closed Fri May 30 00:00:00 2003