--- Day changed --- Log opened Fri Jul 04 00:00:02 2003 02:52 -!- snide [~snide@AMontsouris-108-1-33-45.w81-53.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #uml 02:53 -!- ElectricElf [david@elf.noc.oftc.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 03:17 -!- ElectricElf [david@elf.noc.oftc.net] has joined #uml 03:27 -!- stratsi [~stratsi@80.72.68.187] has joined #uml 03:28 < stratsi> is it possible to run uml on redhat 9? 03:28 < stratsi> as it's with 2.4.20-8 kernel 03:34 < Pahan> Why not? 03:41 < stratsi> i can't find the patch for it 03:42 < stratsi> and rh 9 is using nptl 03:42 < stratsi> i dont know if both are compatible 03:42 < Pahan> Huh? Why do you need a patch to run UMLs? 03:43 < stratsi> i thought i need to patch my kernel to run uml 03:43 < ido> hmm. 03:43 < stratsi> im reading the howto 03:44 < stratsi> or i miss something 04:03 -!- ElectricElf [david@elf.noc.oftc.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 04:05 -!- ElectricElf [david@elf.noc.oftc.net] has joined #uml 04:19 -!- ElectricElf [david@elf.noc.oftc.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 04:35 -!- ElectricElf [david@elf.noc.oftc.net] has joined #uml 04:44 < snide> stratsi: u don't really care about the host Kernel. (else than for the SKAS patch) 04:46 < snide> stratsi: it's only the UML (ie the guest) that needs to be patched. And i don't see any prob to have a vanilla (or almost: -djc* ) kernel for the guest. 04:50 -!- revenger [revenger@p508B3667.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #uml 04:51 < stratsi> snide: thanks a lot 04:52 -!- revenger2 [revenger@80.139.29.134] has quit [Ping timeout: 488 seconds] 04:55 < snide> stratsi: ur welcome 04:57 -!- mistral [mistral@jstevenson.plus.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 488 seconds] 06:03 < stratsi> uh i can't compile old kernel on this rh 9 box becouse of the new glibc 06:17 < Getty> i just bought uml.cx 06:17 < Getty> :-) 06:17 < Getty> subdomains wishes as email to torsten@raudssus.de 06:17 < Getty> (please one A record or one NS record) 06:18 < Getty> (of course free :) ) 06:23 < green> cool 06:24 < Getty> yeah 06:24 < Getty> i'm proud 06:24 < Getty> :) 06:25 < Getty> i didn't thought that its free 06:25 < Getty> you want some green.uml.cx? ;-) 06:26 < Getty> (lol... green uml... yeah... it needs color support) 06:26 < green> I just do not know what to put there, so probably no. 06:28 < stratsi> i want xml.uml.cx lol 06:29 < Getty> LOL 06:29 < Getty> no problem 06:29 < Getty> NS? 06:29 < stratsi> 81.29.192.98 06:30 < stratsi> 195.96.243.114 (2nd) 06:32 < Getty> pl 06:32 < Getty> ok 06:35 < stratsi> thanks 06:35 < stratsi> > xml.uml.cx 06:35 < stratsi> Server: NS.MZRZ.NET 06:35 < stratsi> Address: 212.84.209.14#53 06:35 < stratsi> ** server can't find xml.uml.cx: NXDOMAIN 06:39 < Getty> yeah yeah i'm on it ;) 06:39 < Getty> sorry 06:39 < Getty> looked at the technical preview of half-life 2 06:39 < Getty> wow 06:40 < Getty> now its done 06:40 < Getty> will active on other dns in 1-2 minutes 06:45 < Getty> do you make a host xml.uml.cx? 06:45 < Getty> cool name ;) 06:55 < stratsi> yes i did! 06:56 < stratsi> your ns is ok 10x! 06:56 < Getty> :) 07:10 < ljlane> Is anyone familiar with this compilation error? include/asm/processor.h:66: error: `CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT' undeclared here (not in a function) 07:32 < snide> Getty: uml.cx doesn't have much WHOIS infos... 07:57 < Getty> re 07:59 < Getty> who is responsibale fuer the #uml archives? 08:00 < Getty> fuer? for :) 08:09 < green> probably it's david 08:12 < Getty> ok 08:12 < Getty> should make vhost 08:12 < Getty> irc.uml.cx 08:12 < Getty> :) 08:12 < Getty> or channel.uml.cx 08:13 < Lathiat> uh, why? 08:13 < Lathiat> www.theshore.net/irc/uml/ ,-- a contact link? 08:22 < Getty> mh? 08:22 < snide> Lathiat: wasn't it caker that set up the www.theshore.net/irc/uml/ ? 08:22 < Getty> shorter url 08:22 < Getty> shorter url always cool 08:23 < snide> Getty: copy/paste is even cooler ;-p 08:23 < Getty> for #debian.de we have http://channel.debian.de/ as channel-page, that looks kind a cool 08:23 < Getty> snide: hehe 08:23 < Lathiat> probably 08:23 < Getty> a few days ago i thought about asking for channel.usermodelinux.org for a small page 08:24 < Getty> but had to much todo, and today i saw that uml.cx was free 08:27 < snide> Getty: i think there're still many uml. that are still free 08:28 < Getty> snide: i don't think so 08:28 < Getty> snide: you have 2 problems: first: they must allow 3 letter domains and second: they must allow you to register from outside 08:30 < snide> Getty: uml.tv is also free. [ but a *little* expensive ] 08:31 < Getty> snide: yeah.. how many? 08:31 < Getty> snide: uml.ag is also free but i don't wanna pay 500$ / year 08:32 < snide> Getty: a nice one is q.tv that is still free 08:32 < snide> Getty: but 10,000$/year ;-((( 08:32 < Getty> hehehe 08:33 < Getty> so i think uml.cx is anyway cool choice 08:33 < Getty> but that was expansive too.. 45$ / year is expansive in my eyes :) 08:51 -!- pirlouit [~peter@64.162.195.202] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 09:57 -!- stratsi [~stratsi@80.72.68.187] has quit [Quit: BitchX: the fresh-maker!] 11:12 -!- smcavoy [~smcavoy@grimlock.drive-megawheels.net] has joined #uml 11:16 < david> hello 11:26 < ljlane> greetings 11:26 < Getty> hey david 11:34 < david> ljlane: what did you see that compliation error with? 11:37 * BB has fd.cx and its well worth $45/yr ;) 11:37 < Getty> BB: hehe 11:37 < Getty> BB: at last of course i think too uml.cx its the money worth ;) 11:38 < BB> Getty heh 11:39 < ljlane> david, one of the 2.5.xx attempts. I don't even recall which now, but I've seen it before. I just sucessfully compiled a 2.5.70-jm. 11:40 < Getty> btw.. what about emulation of bootrom anyway? :) so? 11:40 < Getty> would be cool to have a test environement on this part :) 11:40 < david> ljlane: oh, okay - I've not looked at 2.5 in a while 11:51 -!- mistral [mistral@jstevenson.plus.com] has joined #uml 11:54 -!- ticallion [~ticallion@194.126.0.145] has joined #uml 12:00 -!- snide [~snide@AMontsouris-108-1-33-45.w81-53.abo.wanadoo.fr] has quit [Quit: going back home...] 12:22 -!- ElectricElf [david@elf.noc.oftc.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 12:30 -!- ticallion [~ticallion@194.126.0.145] has quit [Quit: brb] 12:32 -!- ticallion [~ticallion@213.175.160.20] has joined #uml 12:39 -!- ticallion is now known as ticallion[phone] 12:49 -!- ticallion[phone] [~ticallion@213.175.160.20] has quit [Quit: brb] 12:56 -!- ticallion [~ticallion@213.175.160.20] has joined #uml 12:57 -!- ticallion [~ticallion@213.175.160.20] has left #uml [] 12:57 -!- ticallion [~ticallion@213.175.160.20] has joined #uml 13:08 -!- ticallion [~ticallion@213.175.160.20] has quit [Quit: later] 13:24 -!- db [~db@ppp-217-133-209-195.cust-adsl.tiscali.it] has joined #uml 13:45 -!- caker [~null@pcp507591pcs.nash01.tn.comcast.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 13:45 -!- caker [~null@68.52.196.167] has joined #uml 13:46 -!- ElectricElf [~david@elf.noc.oftc.net] has joined #uml 13:50 -!- DnsInfector [~DnsInfect@81.49.44.12] has joined #uml 13:50 -!- ticallion [~ticallion@213.175.160.58] has joined #uml 14:34 -!- ticallion[afk [~ticallion@213.175.160.58] has joined #uml 14:35 -!- ticallion [~ticallion@213.175.160.58] has quit [Ping timeout: 490 seconds] 14:41 -!- ticallion[afk [~ticallion@213.175.160.58] has quit [Quit: Client exiting] 14:45 -!- Ryback_ [~ra993482@malazarte.lsd.ic.unicamp.br] has joined #uml 14:47 -!- mistral [mistral@jstevenson.plus.com] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 14:47 -!- mistral [mistral@jstevenson.plus.com] has joined #uml 15:10 -!- ElectricElf [~david@elf.noc.oftc.net] has quit [] 15:28 -!- ElectricElf [~david@elf.noc.oftc.net] has joined #uml 17:27 -!- smcavoy [~smcavoy@grimlock.drive-megawheels.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 17:38 -!- DnsInfector_ [~DnsInfect@81.53.251.173] has joined #uml 17:45 -!- DnsInfector [~DnsInfect@81.49.44.12] has quit [Ping timeout: 488 seconds] 17:49 -!- DnsInfector_ [~DnsInfect@81.53.251.173] has quit [Ping timeout: 488 seconds] 18:03 -!- DnsInfector [~DnsInfect@81.53.247.242] has joined #uml 18:20 -!- db [~db@ppp-217-133-209-195.cust-adsl.tiscali.it] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 18:33 -!- Ryback_ [~ra993482@malazarte.lsd.ic.unicamp.br] has quit [Quit: Client Exiting] 19:44 -!- ticallion [~ticallion@213.175.160.109] has joined #uml 19:48 < Lathiat> is there a 2.4.21 patch? 19:48 < Lathiat> i only get one reject appylin gthe 2.4.20 19:48 < Lathiat> ill see if i can hand fix that 19:49 < caker> Lathiat: http://kernels.usermodelinux.org/patches/uml-patch-2.4.21.bz2 19:50 < Lathiat> hrm is that linked from the download page? 19:51 < caker> naw - it david fixed the reject and remade the patch 19:52 < caker> Lathiat: he sent out notices to uml lists 19:52 < Lathiat> ahh 19:57 < Lathiat> anyone knwo if Bonding driver or EQL would be usable under UML? 19:57 < Lathiat> to like link to the host on two virtual interfaces? thatd be cute 20:12 -!- DnsInfector [~DnsInfect@81.53.247.242] has left #uml [Client exiting] 20:31 < Lathiat> In file included from printk.c:27: 20:31 < Lathiat> /home/lathiat/five/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/interrupt.h:129: error: `CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT' undeclared here (not in a function) 20:31 < Lathiat> /home/lathiat/five/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/interrupt.h:129: error: requested alignment is not a constant 20:34 < ljlane> I've seen that CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT error at various times. In fact, I asked about it here around 13 hours ago when dealing with 2.5.xx um kernels. 2.4.21-um just built for me. 20:39 < ljlane> It like the "um" EXTRAVERSION was left out of the patch. 21:01 < ljlane> or I just screwed something up, which is more likely 21:10 < Lathiat> shrug 21:10 < Lathiat> bbl 21:42 < desaster> l 21:42 < desaster> oops 21:54 < david> ljlane: looks like something screwed up, since UML isn't compiled as an X86 cpu 22:03 -!- ticallion [~ticallion@213.175.160.109] has quit [Quit: bbl] 22:27 -!- kara [~kara@varstation.lanscape.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 490 seconds] --- Log closed Sat Jul 05 00:00:00 2003