페도라 코어 2(FC2)로 페도라 업데이트

댓글 (7)

1. 
   fajar September 15, 2004 at 12:59 am

   I believe you should also move /usr/lib/tls to /usr/lib/tls-disabled.
   I didn’t do that previously and my BIND keeps dying.

   Reply
2. 
   caker September 15, 2004 at 1:11 am

   [quote:871a43d58e=”fajar”]I believe you should also move /usr/lib/tls to /usr/lib/tls-disabled.
   I didn’t do that previously and my BIND keeps dying.[/quote]
   And moving /lib/tls fixes that problem?

   Reply
3. 
   bjohnson September 15, 2004 at 8:36 pm

   [quote:c33378914c=”caker”]I’ve updated the Fedora distro for Fedora Core 2. The minimum size increased a little bit to 630MB. If you plan on using this with a 2.6 kernel, make sure to “mv /lib/tls /lib/tls-disabled” until UML fully supports NPTL.

   [img]http://fedora.redhat.com/images/header-fedora_logo.png[/img]

   -Chris[/quote]

   You can also downgrade your glibc-*.i686.rpm to glibc-*.i386.rpm. This has had no ill effects for me and I don’t have to worry about yum upgrading glibc and replacing the /lib/tls directory.

   If you are going to try FC3 (test) this will not work since the i386 rpm seems to contain the tls libraries.

   Reply
4. 
   fajar September 15, 2004 at 11:43 pm

   [quote:4b8769ef90=”caker”]And moving /lib/tls fixes that problem?[/quote]
   /lib/tls and /usr/lib/tls.
   MySQL seems OK with just /lib/tls moved, but BIND still keeps dying at random times until I also moved /usr/lib/tls

   Reply
5. 
   sweh September 17, 2004 at 5:18 pm

   [quote:733db60b54=”caker”]I’ve updated the Fedora distro for Fedora Core 2. The minimum size increased a little bit to 630MB. If you plan on using this with a 2.6 kernel, make sure to “mv /lib/tls /lib/tls-disabled” until UML fully supports NPTL.[/quote]
   You’ve <i>removed</i> FC1 from the list of choices? Hmm. So I can no longer rebuild my linode back to how it was, if I needed to? You have RH8 and 9, and Slackware 9 and 10, would it be possible to have FC1 and FC2 ?

   Reply
6. 
   noderat September 18, 2004 at 3:41 pm

   I’m not really a fan of FC/Redhat but it seems logitcal to supply FC1 as well as FC2 if your supplying old RH versions.

   Reply
7. 
   caker September 18, 2004 at 3:53 pm

   [quote:b90fb03bdb=”noderat”]I’m not really a fan of FC/Redhat but it seems logitcal to supply FC1 as well as FC2 if your supplying old RH versions.[/quote]
   Done!

   -Chris

   Reply