万众期待的 LinodeObject Storage 终于发布了！我们构建 LinodeObject Storage 的目的是让开发人员更轻松、更经济地管理内容资产等非结构化数据，以及应对人工智能和机器学习等复杂的数据密集型存储挑战。
要查看开发人员可能使用对象存储的其他方式，请查看我们的文档。
LinodeObject Storage与S3 兼容，具有高可用性和易扩展性，可满足您在备份、大数据和数据归档方面的任何需求。有了Object Storage ，您无需拥有或使用 Linode 虚拟机，即可从存储文件或扩展容量中获益。LinodeObject Storage 在我们的纽瓦克数据中心立即可用，并将在未来几个月内推广到我们的其他地区。
LinodeObject Storage 起价为 5 美元/月，包括 250GB 和 1TB 向外传输，超出部分的存储和传输费用为 0.02 美元/GB。每个客户、每个集群的存储桶最高可扩展至 10TB。
现在就开始吧!
对于现有的客户，你可以从你的Linode云管理器开始配置和管理你的非结构化数据和静态网站。这真的就像点击一个按钮一样容易。
我们文档团队的Leslie制作了一个视频教程，展示了它是多么简单。
那些还不是客户的人可以在这里注册，当你使用代码OBJECT20时，可以为你的前几个月的Linode服务申请20美元的信贷。
要了解更多关于Linode的存储选项，请访问我们的产品页面。
评论 (14)
Good news thanks for the wonderful staff. Greetings
Greetings, Mohammed – Thanks for the kind words!
Bad pricing? Spaces only costs half this for bandwidth including CDN.
Thanks for the feedback, and I’ve shared it with the team.
I hate to saying it but this is disappointing pricing for the storage y’all.
I was really hoping for good pricing and unmetered/uncharged ingress/egress from the object storage if used entirely within the Linode network.
Backblaze B2, for example, is $.005 (half a penny) per GB per month.
The included 1TB of bandwidth is nice, but the storage pricing really needs to be tweaked to be competitive. This just makes it “more of the same” when compared with other providers.
Strive to be better than S3 pricing! You can do it!
We appreciate you taking the time to share this feedback with us, and I’ve passed it along to our team to review. The outbound traffic will work against your transfer pool first, before being charged the $0.02/GB, and 250GB of storage is included in the $5/month.
Bandwidth pricing isn’t everything. You have to compare latency, reliability, etc. Linodes have always been very low latency compared to Amazon so Linode’s offering may be better for things like static site hosting, small files, etc. and other services may work out cheaper for large binary downloads where latency isn’t an issue. It depends on your use case.
Hi,
Good news. When it will be available on Singapore Region and is there any plan to build a new data center in Indonesia 🙂
We don’t currently have anything to share, but we’ve taken note of your interest! Make sure to keep an eye on the blog for our latest updates.
Let’s say I have a use that requires distributing large files to users, who expect to download them with reasonable bandwidth, but latency does not matter at all. What would you recommend to use instead?
John If you’d prefer to use something other than Object Storage, then you could set up a Linode with FTP (or your alternative of choice) and use an attached Block Storage Volume to store the data. There’s more info on Block Storage here:
https://www.linode.com/docs/guides/how-to-use-block-storage-with-your-linode/
For AWS, from some documentation: “An Amazon S3 bucket has no directory hierarchy such as you would find in a typical computer file system. You can, however, create a logical hierarchy by using object key names that imply a folder structure. For example, instead of naming an object sample.jpg, you can name it photos/2006/February/sample.jpg.”
Is this the same with Linode’s object storage? The video indicates that you can upload folders, and they will actually show up in the web interface as being a folder. When doing this, is the folder virtual in nature, or does it actually exist in the bucket?
Hey Kirby – the short answer here is yes! You can do this with Linode Object Storage as well. Technically, the file structure is still flat, but you can still emulate folders/folder hierarchy when uploading objects.
As in the video, if you’re using the Cloud Manager, this can be achieved by uploading a folder with object in it already or by dragging objects directly into an already-established folder.
For more tips/tricks/tools, check out our How to Use Linode Object Storage guide.
When you’ll add CDN to your spaces, like DigitalOcean does? For even better latency for people/users from the same local area/state