期待已久的Linode Object Storage的推出终于来了!我们建立了Linode Object Storage，使开发者更容易和更实惠地管理非结构化数据，如内容资产，以及围绕人工智能和机器学习的复杂和数据密集型存储挑战。
要查看开发人员可能使用对象存储的其他方式，请查看我们的文档。
Linode对象存储是与S3 兼容的、高度可用的、易于扩展的存储，可满足您的任何备份、大数据和数据存档需求。通过对象存储，您不需要拥有或使用Linode虚拟机，就可以从存储文件或扩展容量中获益。Linode对象存储在我们的纽瓦克数据中心立即可用，并将在未来几个月开始向我们的其他地区推广。
Linode对象存储起价为5美元/月，包括250GB和1TB的向外传输，然后超过这个数字的存储和传输为0.02美元/GB。每个客户在每个集群中可扩展到10TB的存储桶。
现在就开始吧!
对于现有的客户，你可以从你的Linode云管理器开始配置和管理你的非结构化数据和静态网站。这真的就像点击一个按钮一样容易。
我们文档团队的Leslie制作了一个视频教程，展示了它是多么简单。
那些还不是客户的人可以在这里注册，当你使用代码OBJECT20时，可以为你的前几个月的Linode服务申请20美元的信贷。
要了解更多关于Linode的存储选项，请访问我们的产品页面。
评论 (14)
Good news thanks for the wonderful staff. Greetings
Greetings, Mohammed – Thanks for the kind words!
Bad pricing? Spaces only costs half this for bandwidth including CDN.
Thanks for the feedback, and I’ve shared it with the team.
I hate to saying it but this is disappointing pricing for the storage y’all.
I was really hoping for good pricing and unmetered/uncharged ingress/egress from the object storage if used entirely within the Linode network.
Backblaze B2, for example, is $.005 (half a penny) per GB per month.
The included 1TB of bandwidth is nice, but the storage pricing really needs to be tweaked to be competitive. This just makes it “more of the same” when compared with other providers.
Strive to be better than S3 pricing! You can do it!
We appreciate you taking the time to share this feedback with us, and I’ve passed it along to our team to review. The outbound traffic will work against your transfer pool first, before being charged the $0.02/GB, and 250GB of storage is included in the $5/month.
Bandwidth pricing isn’t everything. You have to compare latency, reliability, etc. Linodes have always been very low latency compared to Amazon so Linode’s offering may be better for things like static site hosting, small files, etc. and other services may work out cheaper for large binary downloads where latency isn’t an issue. It depends on your use case.
Hi,
Good news. When it will be available on Singapore Region and is there any plan to build a new data center in Indonesia 🙂
We don’t currently have anything to share, but we’ve taken note of your interest! Make sure to keep an eye on the blog for our latest updates.
Let’s say I have a use that requires distributing large files to users, who expect to download them with reasonable bandwidth, but latency does not matter at all. What would you recommend to use instead?
John If you’d prefer to use something other than Object Storage, then you could set up a Linode with FTP (or your alternative of choice) and use an attached Block Storage Volume to store the data. There’s more info on Block Storage here:
https://www.linode.com/docs/guides/how-to-use-block-storage-with-your-linode/
For AWS, from some documentation: “An Amazon S3 bucket has no directory hierarchy such as you would find in a typical computer file system. You can, however, create a logical hierarchy by using object key names that imply a folder structure. For example, instead of naming an object sample.jpg, you can name it photos/2006/February/sample.jpg.”
Is this the same with Linode’s object storage? The video indicates that you can upload folders, and they will actually show up in the web interface as being a folder. When doing this, is the folder virtual in nature, or does it actually exist in the bucket?
Hey Kirby – the short answer here is yes! You can do this with Linode Object Storage as well. Technically, the file structure is still flat, but you can still emulate folders/folder hierarchy when uploading objects.
As in the video, if you’re using the Cloud Manager, this can be achieved by uploading a folder with object in it already or by dragging objects directly into an already-established folder.
For more tips/tricks/tools, check out our How to Use Linode Object Storage guide.
When you’ll add CDN to your spaces, like DigitalOcean does? For even better latency for people/users from the same local area/state