I am curious...
If Linode was in the situation as Amazon is in hosting the Parlor servers, what would Linode do in regards to the recent censoring/banning and disabling of Parler servers?
Other than that you spelled "Parler" wrong, this is a question I'd like to see addressed too. Although honestly in today's cultural climate probably the best thing for the company would be to remain mum. Digital Ocean just preemptively took a virtue-signally politically-correct position and it's the reason I'm over here investigating Linode ;-)
I see Linode's Acceptable Use Policy and it covers the usual boiler plate. Unfortunately in a world where words have been reduced to mean whatever the hearer wants them to mean, those terms don't tell me how they would handle a situation like "the Parler dilemma". The accusation of course is that Parler was full of hate speech, but no matter what your political bent there is no doubt egregious content regularly shows up on Twitter/Facebook/Etc. in even larger volumes.
So how does Linode feel about being a platform form services that make a good faith effort to only host legal content, but through any mechanism (even if it's comment sections) end up with controversial content? Would Linode similarly –sans any legal action at all– capitulate to social pressure alone and pull the plug on a Twitter? a Facebook … a Gab? a Mastodon? a Parler?